I'm therefore asking anyone who reads this blog to go here and sign the petition.
Mohammed wasn't depicted banging a goat for goodness sakes. But the UCL complaint seems to only consider the view that it would upset Muslim students. Is there a good reason why the image of Jesus would not offend Christians?
The UCL need to think carefully about the road they are going down. And consider how ridiculous this really is in the grand scheme of things...
http://zombietime.com/mohammed_image_archive/recent/ |
UPDATE 19/01/2012
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-16615312
The President of the UCL Atheist Society has resigned.
"Robbie stepped aside because he signed up as president to organise events and run a student society," said Michael Paynter, secretary for the National Federation of Atheist, Humanist and Secular Student Societies.
"He did not appreciate the stress he would be under when dealing with a controversy like this, so he wanted to make way for someone else."
The Ahmadiyya Muslim Youth Association is continuing with its protest against the image, saying it has wider implications.
Adam Walker, the association's national spokesperson, said the two student groups had worked well together in the past and said the offence was unnecessary.
"There is no need to print these things other than to cause offence and history has told us that these things cause offence."
No-one has the right not to be offended. And with logic like that on display, I would think that the Muslim Youth Association might be better of finding someone more equipped intellectually to cope with their press responsibilities.
No comments:
Post a Comment